Kakyo's profileKakyo.mix.zipPhotosBlogLists Tools Help
    8/31/2007

    有一种毒药叫成功

     

    有一种毒药叫成功

    2007-08-17 15:26:45  新周刊 
    【 浏览字号:

    搜索更多 成功 的资讯 >>>

        现代社会有三粒毒药:消费主义、性自由和成功学。

      消费主义以品牌为噱头,以时尚为药效,将人卷入无休止的购买与淘汰的恶性循环中,恋物成瘾;

      性自由以人性为噱头,以性爱为药效,不断释放暧昧与激情的烟幕弹,纵欲成瘾;

      成功学以速成为噱头,以名利为药效,误导急于走捷径成为人上人的年轻人投身其中,投机成瘾。

      三粒毒药中,以成功学危害最巨——它以教育之名,行“毒”化社会气氛、“毒”化人心、破坏多元价值观之实。

      在成功学的逻辑中,如果你没有赚到“豪宅、名车、年入百万”,如果你没有成为他人艳羡的成功人士,就证明你不行,你犯了“不成功罪”!

      助你“实现人生价值”、“开发个人潜能”、“三个月赚到一百万”、“有车有房”、“三十五岁以前退休”……成功学泛滥于职场和网络,上进人群迷失在多款提升课程和短期培训班里,成功学大师满天飞,成功学培训蔚为大观成产业。

      ——我们何时变得如此迫切渴望成功?成功何以变得如此简单粗暴?那些成功学大师除了演讲收钱还能做什么成功的事?我们可不可以不成功?

      个人奋斗很可嘉,实现自我很诱人,名利滋味很甜美。但一个社会结构中,成功人士不过1%,且离不开长期实干和机遇。若成功一学就会,且成王败寇,成功人士光荣,非成功人士可耻,那么,社会中99%的大多数还怎么活下去?生活中有许多美好事物和价值,是成功学课程所蔑视、给不了的和教不会的。

      当全民成功变成狂热风潮,成功上升为绝对真理般的、人人趋之若鹜的主流价值观,成功学就是一粒毒药,而信奉成功学的人就沦为牺牲品。

    当一个刚毕业的大学生在日记中写下近似谵语的成功梦想时,我们无从断定这种梦想虚幻与否;当众多的人沉浸在以“别对自己说不可能”之类的朴素箴言达到成功的迷醉当中,我们也无从判断这种成功捷径的可行性;当全社会都奉行着“豪宅、宝马、年入百万”的成功标准时,我们也无法知晓这种价值观的正确性。

      我们唯一可知的是,我们全社会都在追求成功,尽管我们并不知道什么叫做成功。开发潜能、拓展人脉、身心灵平衡,执行力、细节、沟通、行销,感恩、励志、提升……我们用尽了所有的方法和词汇来表达迫切成功的心情。

      毫无疑问,在当下的急躁情绪中,成功学讲师已然成功,众多追随者渴望成功,中国正在成功。

    有一种毒药叫成功 - 21CN.COM - 新闻中心

    8/17/2007

    The DVDs, Histories, and Struggles.

    Received the DVD box-sets <井冈山> and <长征> from Mom and Dad, respectively. Accepted with pleasure. Yet, this is somehow surprising.

    In every aspect, life is a spiral.

    20 years ago, I was trained to love the "official" history, sampled at an outrageously low temporal sampling rate and carefully filtered. I was even able to sing tens of political songs at that age, none of which were supposed to be popular among or even comprehended by kids. There was me, however, singing those pieces again and again upon the requests from adults. Well, when they were created, those songs were definitely Chinese Rock 'n' Roll and truly political music in the Western sense, which is supposed to be about change (or the colorized word "revolution"). Still, there was at least one piece of message that has been useful to me all the time: my life is the result of thousands of deaths.

    Ironically, most functions of these torches had been worn out when passed on to our hands, to my slim vocal tract. As the ego sprouted, I halted the purposeless singing. Much like switching to the blog territories from Sina, I ran away from the clueless lyrics, at the sight of stuff like U2 and Guns & Roses (of course, after ditching the even more clueless 80's pop). The emotional burst leads kids to rebellions and their own isolated spiritual constructions. Fortunately, most parents did their jobs in advance to frame their kids' minds with basic machineries, so that they wouldn't be completely alone during the constructions. In my darkest hours, the trust in music and arts was the best gift from them, the best machine that I could run in myself. Many initial programs that they wrote were outdated and removed nevertheless.

    Now, the construction is still in progress, with a functional watch tower erected, on which you can't help but see all the landscapes in terms of your own position, the current one and that in the future. Meanwhile, the country grows along with us. Despite the gross productions, the crawling developments, and the banal performances (what the hell is left?), which are quite a challenge to your patience throughout the course, <井冈山> and the other series from the pipeline turn out to be produced at a much higher sampling rate, with medium granularity to see the obscured conflicts in our rusty textbooks. 毛毛 was not hit in the ass in merely those well-known cases but with much more and drastically worse lucks along the road. The conflicts between academia (共产国际) and the industry (毛毛) has been there a long time now. It is stunning to see how many people start from, then depart from, and finally return to this controversial history to seek ultimate lessons in their lives, because it is not about the inevitable consequences or the evitable ones, not about the truth or the censorship. It all comes back to such a question that one may ask oneself: under such self-contained settings (i.e., whether any part of the story was true or not), how could one turn the faintest sparkle into an unstoppable flame.

    I hope this spiral of mine is going up.

    8/13/2007

    被幽默感

    不知道英语里有没有这个词.

    说我一脸严肃的人比较多, 其实那是被幽默感在低于光速下的表现.

    在光速笑话领域, 本人一向是人群中笑得最疯狂最持久的...

    粉喜欢武状元苏乞儿里周星驰跟吴孟达一边大摇大摆走出正在被抄的家门一边狂笑那段.

    那里有被幽默感的两大起源, 同情心和荒诞.

    剧中人的幽默感以被幽默感的形式展现, 继而启动了看客的被幽默感.

    8/10/2007

    不许联想 » Blog Archive » 加减法

     

    现在奥运会就剩下主题歌没公布了,也不知道会写成什么样子,估计好听不到哪里去。因为在北京奥组委看来,它不仅仅是一首歌,里面还要蕴含着很多意义,有象征意义,有现实意义,有体育的意义,有和平的意义,有他妈好多各种各样的意义,这样的歌曲,能好听才怪。

    你看会徽,整的就挺扭曲的,反正外国人从来没见过印章艺术,然后有一大堆解释,弄一个糊弄一下老外还可以。吉祥物还不如陕北的某一个老婆婆缝的布娃娃,一下弄了五个,金木水火土,然后也给赋予了一堆意义。我们生怕做不好,所以就什么都要想到,最后弄得很复杂。

    ....

    法国人强调,你们中国的历史太丰富了,一件事情都要把五千年的内容包括进去,只知道做加法,不会做减法。后来我想,也是。你说西方人做事简单,那是经过了多年的资本主义训练,得出来的经验。

    ...

    中国人最适合干的事情是做春节联欢晚会,那种十八般武艺都招活上的晚会形式最符合我们的习惯,面面俱到,一个人能说的话,非要六个人分着说,结果还说错了。但是你看它很受欢迎,弄得越复杂,人们越喜欢,似乎这样可以证明他们认真做事了。

    ...

    所谓穷折腾,就是越没想法越不自信就越喜欢折腾。

    不许联想 » Blog Archive » 加减法

    Some say it's the hardest to perfectly duplicate the simplest. This is a two-folded case. 1st, we are reluctant to decompose the intuitive. 2nd, it's usually a torture not to incorporate our "intelligence" into everything we do, just to delight and to impress, instead of getting things done. Yes, it comes out of fear, out of self-doubt.

    8/7/2007

    not an illusion

    blogger and flickr are back as well!

    8/6/2007

    Wikipedia is back???!!

    i can access it from China again!

    8/1/2007

    The ways to say goodbye to printer jams..

    One is to computerize paper (or to paperize a computer).

    This means to make a piece of paper writable and the content on it editable with a computer or more accurately, an "editor" other than the traditional destructive editing tools (pens, typewriters, and the traditional press system). Problems include the power supply, reliability and persistency, physical size control, foldability, and so on. But to think about printer jams... I still wanna vote to the idea. General computer UI revolution represented by Multi-touch can probably be a way to get around the difficulty involved in document management of individual systems. But to virtualize the entire press paradigm and eliminate the boundary between digital pulications/documents and their carriers, there is a long way to go. Power supply must be the most crucial challenge of all. The project would become much more plausible if the native chemical energy in the paper material could be utilized on the fly, but thermal energy is never friendly in such applications.

    Another way... forget about this whole digital paradigm. Find a smart way, probably chemical, to simplify the "undo" on traditional paper. One thing I can think of is to make the particle coupling between the carbon (or whatever chemical carrier of content) and paper controllable, e.g., the coupling should be loose during the production stage of content verification or revision and then be set to a firm state at the stage of archiving. In this way, the eraser could be much less destructive, meaning that we have minimum hard material cost during the editing phase. In other words, what we need is to control the coupling between the editing material and the storage material throughout the lifetime of a document. Another thing is to make paper kneaded by jamming printers easily reusable, that is, to somehow reset a creased piece of paper to its original flat version. This may require an operable rigidity of paper.

    ANYWAYS, what I really wanted to say:

    I HATE PRINTERS, ALL OF THEM!